Uche Cecil Izuora
A leading methane certification organization has stressed that the European Union’s proposed methane regulations can be implemented using existing monitoring and verification programs, offering a different view after the United States and three major energy-exporting nations warned the rules could threaten Europe’s future oil and natural gas supplies.
Earlier this week, U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright joined the energy ministers of Qatar, Nigeria and Algeria in an open letter urging European Union leaders to delay implementation of the EU Methane Regulation (EUMR). The four countries argued that many exporters will be unable to meet the regulation’s monitoring, reporting and verification (MRV) requirements by the January 2027 implementation deadline, potentially disrupting energy supplies and increasing prices across Europe.
The letter called on the EU to adopt a “stop-the-clock” mechanism to delay implementation while compliance methodologies are finalized, grandfather new supply contracts signed during the transition period, and suspend penalties for noncompliance.
The ministers also warned that, according to an independent industry analysis, nearly all EU oil imports and a significant share of natural gas imports could be considered noncompliant when the regulation takes effect unless changes are made.
In response, methane certification nonprofit MiQ said the industry’s progress on emissions monitoring demonstrates that implementation is already achievable using existing certification and independent verification programs.
“We recognize the practical challenges raised by the exporting countries featured in Secretary Chris Wright’s letter,” said Georges Tijbosch, chief executive of MiQ. “However, we do not believe they are insurmountable.”
According to MiQ, more than 7 per cent of global natural gas supply is currently certified through its methane performance program, including roughly 30% of U.S. gas production. The organization said existing certification frameworks already provide a practical pathway for producers to satisfy the monitoring, reporting and verification requirements outlined in the EU regulation.
“There is broad consensus across industry that methane emissions must be reduced,” Tijbosch said. “Credible methane performance certification frameworks and independent verification programmes already provide a practical pathway to meeting the EU Methane Regulation’s monitoring, reporting and verification requirements—and they are operational in the field today.”
Rather than postponing implementation, MiQ said governments, regulators and industry should focus on refining compliance pathways as experience with the regulation grows.
“The EUMR sets a north star for global methane transparency,” Tijbosch said. “The conversation should now focus on implementation through iteration, not postponement.”
The debate comes as methane emissions have become an increasingly important consideration in international natural gas trade, with Europe seeking greater transparency around upstream emissions while major exporting nations caution that compliance timelines must reflect operational realities.